This article is with reference an article and subsequent comments written in the blog of Mr. Pankaj Seksaria. Please click on the title of this post to visit Mr Pankaj’s blog. The author is a environmentalist, freelance journalist, photographer and author. He has written several articles in newspapers and journals including an article about the Dhamra Port Project. The blog talks about the a report by Greenpeace to the project proposal by Dhamra Port Company (DPC), a 50:50 joint venture by L&T and Tata Steel, in Orrisa and the comment is in response to it by a manager of DPC. The project involves building a port at Dhamra between Gahirmatha, one of the world’s largest nesting sites for Oliver Ridley Turtles, and Bhitarkanika Wildlife Sanctuary, the second largest mangrove reserve in the country. The plot of the story is not out of the ordinary. A corporation proposes a project, the NGO’s stage a protest citing environmental concerns, the government delays but eventually gives its nod to the proposal. What are the two sides of the story?
Side 1 – Environmentalists and Conservationists including Greenpeace, WPSI, Wildlife Society of Orissa, Operation Kachhapa, etc
The environmentalists claim that the activities at the Dhamra port will have affect the surrounding environment in many ways.
- Dredging
What it is? – It is the deepening of shallow waters so that ships can sail through them.
What it does? – Dredging affects the movement pattern of the turtles and hence reduces or even possibly completely eliminates the nesting of turtles in the area.
- Oil spills
What it is? – Oil spills from the ships that come to the port.
What it does? – This is a no brainer, oil spills present problems of new dimension to all of marine life and especially the turtles. Oil spills also present a huge problem for the mangrove forests which are the only things between the people and the tornadoes.
- The traffic
What it is? – The heavy influx of ships in and out of the port.
What it does? – The traffic of ships will pass through the turtle congregation area and hence might adversely affect the nesting turtles. Greenpeace also claims that this could affect the population of horseshoe crabs on the coast and also other marine life. The change in marine life would affect the livelihood of fisherman in the area.
- The lights
What it is? – The lights from the ship and the port
What it does? – It attracts the new born turtles to the port and ships away from their actual path.
They also claim that the turtles did not come to nest in Gahirmatha this year because of the construction activities of the port.
Side 2 – Dhamra Port Company
The Dharma port company claims that the port and all its related activities will have absolutely no effect on the turtles and marine life. They further say that the findings of the environmentalists are mere speculation and not based on facts. They claim on their wesite the following to be the facts
- The site at which the port is being planned is the only range in the coast of Orissa where nesting of turtles does not take place.
- The site is well beyond the limits of Gahirmatha Sanctuary and National Marine Sanctuary.
- The site is not close to Gahirmatha beach and is about 30 kms away by sea and hence no actual damage can occur.
(Their entire defense can be accessed at http://www.dhamraport.com/turtles.asp)
Regarding the assertion that the turtles did not nest this year because of the port construction activities, the CEO of CEO of the Dhamra Port Company Santosh K. Mohapatra says "We are carrying out works under the guidance of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). In the past also turtles did not come for nesting. It is mischievous and unfounded speculation that dredging is affecting nesting."
Who’s Right
The claims by the environmentalists are more right than those by Dhamra Port. The Dhamra port claim that their project will in no way harm the turtle population is an immature approach to avoiding the situation. As the IUCN team working on the dredging site so rightly put it, they are working together to minimize the impact of the port on turtles and other marine life. The port has been given the green signal by the government on a technical and legal standpoint. Although they are legally right in building a port there, they are turning a blind eye to certain possible repercussions to the environment and living in denial. Though working with IUCN is a positive step, the standpoint of the environmentalists should definitely be considered and further precautions should be taken. The solution is for Dhamra Port Compan to come to an amicable settlement with the environmentalist groups and the first step is for the company to not be in denial.